How IMMERSE and ImmerseMe Compare on Core Principles of Language Learning
Language training in virtual reality is an exciting innovation—but not all VR language apps are created equal. A recent study comparing IMMERSE and ImmerseMe found that while both use immersive 3D environments to support learning, IMMERSE aligns more closely with the key principles of second language acquisition research.
Researchers at Oakwood University evaluated both platforms using a five-part rubric grounded in second language pedagogy. Here’s what they found—and why it matters for companies investing in language training.
What did the researchers evaluate?
The researchers examined how well each platform aligned with 5 principles supported by second language acquisition research:
- Focus on meaning – Learners should use language to convey ideas and understand messages.
- Comprehensible input – Learners need exposure to language that is understandable but slightly above their current level.
- Focus on form – Instruction should draw learners’ attention to grammar and language structure as needed.
- Interaction – Opportunities to engage in communicative exchanges are essential.
- Motivation – Learning environments should promote motivation, confidence, and sustained engagement.
The researchers took two Spanish lessons on IMMERSE and two on ImmerseMe. Then, they used their rubric to evaluate each lesson and determine the extent to which each of the 5 key principles was present on either platform.
What did the researchers find?
In their analysis, IMMERSE outscored ImmerseMe on all 5 pedagogical principles of second language acquisition.
The researchers found IMMERSE to be especially strong with regards to Focus on Form and Interaction.
“IMMERSE as an application provides better opportunities for feedback on form for the learners. It also provides better opportunities for explicit instruction of grammar and pronunciation,” the researchers explained.
They also noted that ImmerseMe, as an entirely self-guided language platform, cannot provide opportunities for the negotiation of meaning that lies at the core of truly authentic communication.
On the other hand, they found that IMMERSE provides ample opportunities for community interaction and collaboration, key building blocks of language development.
Additionally, the researchers noted that IMMERSE excels at language training because:
- Learners receive real-time, live feedback from trainers during lessons.
- Lessons include explicit instruction of form and conscious noticing techniques.
- Lessons provide learners with the opportunity to negotiate and collaborate with others in the language they are learning.
- Lessons are scaffolded to help learners achieve specific learning outcomes.
- IMMERSE helps learners build a language learning community.
The researchers also go on to explain that both platforms have strengths and are helpful for learning a language. However, they note that Immerse goes a step further than ImmerseMe by offering live experiences with real people.
They presented their findings at the 2023 WorldCALL Conference in Chang Mai, Thailand:
Why This Matters for Business Language Training
Corporate language training is only effective if employees stay engaged and improve their real-world communication skills. According to the study, the inclusion of live interaction and expert guidance makes IMMERSE more effective for long-term language development.
This doesn’t just benefit learners—it impacts your business. Better language skills improve collaboration, reduce miscommunication, and accelerate global readiness.
Choosing a platform that aligns with language science leads to stronger outcomes and better ROI.
Research source
Lesnov, R., & Wolhein-Nava, S. (2023). IMMERSE vs ImmerseMe: Who wins? Exploring the pedagogical potential of the VR-based language learning apps. Paper Presentation at the WORLDCALL Conference 2023 in Chiang Mai, Thailand.
.png)
